Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Med Devices (Auckl) ; 17: 113-122, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38481825

RESUMEN

Introduction: Laboratory examination is extremely important in handling the COVID-19 pandemic. In the first era of the pandemic, the molecular and antigen tests were limited. Hence, at that time, it was necessary to carry out antibody Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDT). However, many antibody RDTs were yet to obtain Food and Drug Authorization (FDA)'s approval. Purpose: Therefore, The Indonesian Association of Clinical Pathology and Medical Laboratory (PDS PatKLIn) decided to conduct a validity test of RDT antibodies to find out the quality of SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis performance based on these RDTs used. Patient and Methods: This is a descriptive observational design with diagnostic analysis. The retrospective secondary data were collected from 34 provinces in Indonesia from May to June 2020. Data analysis was carried out on the sensitivity and specificity values of each antibody RDT brand to the RT-PCR result and analyzed descriptive data. Results: The amount of secondary data of antibody RDT and RT-PCR results collected was 139,908, consisting of 59 RDT brands of which 44% were authorized by The Indonesian COVID-19 Response Acceleration Task Force (Gugus Tugas Percepatan Penanganan COVID-19 Indonesia). There were huge variations of SARS-CoV-2 antibody RDT performance between total antibody types (sensitivity 59.18%, specificity 62%), IgM RDT (sensitivity 16-100%, specificity 7-97%), and RDT IgG (sensitivity 33-96%, specificity 19-100%). Conclusion: The variations in the RDT antibodies'performance can cause errors in diagnosis leading to significant material and immaterial losses. Therefore, cooperation from various parties is needed for the pre- and post-marketing surveillance process to assess the performance and the characteristics of each RDT kit and other diagnostic methods to assist the rapid pandemic response process.

2.
Clin Pathol ; 16: 2632010X231198831, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37719805

RESUMEN

Introduction: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is a risk factor for the occurrence of a large of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) antigen load in the body. The antigens cocktail namely early secretory antigenic target protein 6-kDa (ESAT-6), Culture filtrate protein 10 kDa (CFP-10), and Mycobacterium tuberculosis protein 64 (MPT-64) are secreted by Mtb during replication, hence, their concentration increase in patients with active Tuberculosis (TB). This increased levels facilitates their entry into the systemic circulation, followed by secretion by the glomerulus into the urine. The aim of this study was to determine the positivity rate of the urinary Mtb antigens cocktail between TB patients with and without HIV infection. Methods: This is an observational descriptive comparative study conducted with a cross-sectional design. Random urine samples were collected from patients diagnosed with active TB in Dr. Hasan Sadikin Bandung Hospital in 2021. The subjects were divided into 2 groups, TB-HIV group and TB without HIV group. The samples were tested using the quantitative immunochromatography method. Result: Sixty active TB patients consisting of TB patients with HIV infection (n = 30) and TB patients without HIV infection (n = 30). The positivity in the urinary Mtb antigens cocktail was 93.3% for TB-HIV group and 100% for TB without HIV group (P = .492). The median concentration of urinary Mtb antigens cocktail in TB patients without HIV infection was higher than that of TB patients with HIV infection (137.73 ng/mL vs 96.69 ng/mL, respectively; P = .001). Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the positivity rate, meanwhile, there was a significant difference in concentration of the urinary Mtb antigens cocktail between active TB patients with and without HIV infection. Interestingly, this urinary Mtb antigens cocktail can be found in both groups without being affected by the patient's immune condition, thus becoming a test to assist diagnose active TB.

3.
Open Access Rheumatol ; 15: 43-49, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37143703

RESUMEN

Purpose: Systemic Sclerosis related Interstitial Lung Disease (SSc-ILD) is the most common clinical manifestation of SSc with a high morbidity and mortality rate. However, the Thorax High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HCRT) as the gold standard diagnostic tool for SSc-ILD is not widely equipped in health-care facilities. Recently, specific autoantibody examination (anti-topoisomerase-1 (ATA), anti-Th/To antibody, and anti-fibrillarin) has been studied and used for SSc-ILD diagnosis. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of specific autoantibody examination among SSc-ILD. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study reviews data from local dedicated SSc database (Sclerosis Systemic Register System Development Electronic Medical Record) which were collected between March 2019 and August 2021. Population of this study include adult inpatients and outpatients at Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, who have been diagnosed with SSc based on ACR/EULAR 2013 criteria, which met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The SSc patients were grouped into SSc-ILD and SSc non-ILD based on HRCT and tested for SSC-ILD specific autoantibody test (ATA, anti-Th/To antibody, and anti-fibrillarin) to obtain the diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, and positive- and negative-predictive value). Results: A total of 74 subject grouped into 47 SSc-ILD and 27 SSc-non ILD patients. ATA validity test results showed 85.1% sensitivity, 19.2% specificity, 65.6% PPV, and 41.7% NPV. Anti-Th/To antibody obtained 27.7% sensitivity, 88.9% specificity, 81.3% PPV, and 41.4% NPV. The anti-fibrillarin validity test result showed a 12.8% sensitivity, 96.3% specificity, 85.7% PPV, and 38.8% NPV. The combination of the three parameters had 95.7% sensitivity, 18.5% specificity, 67.1% PPV, and 71.4% NPV. Conclusion: The combination of the SSc-ILD specific autoantibody test and HCRT is expected to detect all affected patients. Based on these results, SSc-ILD autoantibody-specific test can be used as an alternative examination for screening and diagnosis in health-care facilities that are not equipped with HRCT.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...